求認佛經中的一個字 - Powered by Discuz! Archiver

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-17 23:30

“仾”是低的俗字吧。。。,一上先生说得有道理！写本《维摩诘讲经文》中“高低”之“低”正作“仾”。
“相仾贡”，“低”读“诋”，乃“相互诋毁、贡高”。［此主题已被徐伯鸿在 2012-9-18 11:55:31 编辑过］

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 00:33

张铉济南 发表于 2012-9-18 02:22

敢问最右边部分文字的出处。

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 03:18

<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">“贡高”一词在佛经中是“<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">骄傲自大<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">”的意思。“贡高”中的“贡”并不具有“<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">骄傲<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">”的义项，“贡”是个假字，借为“<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[]<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">”字。“<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[]<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">”字的左边是“贡”，细看右边，不太像个“翟”，倒是有些像个“瞿”，这字也许是<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[貢瞿<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">]<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">。“瞿”的行书正作<SPAN lang=ZH-TW style="FONT-SIZE: 24pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 华文行楷; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">瞿<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 03:29

我贴在10楼上的是北京图书馆藏敦煌写经《佛说提谓五戒经并威仪》中的文字。

萧旭发表于 2012-9-18 03:42

要討論“貢高”這詞兒，應當先看看《慧琳音義》，再看看徐復、蔣禮鴻、閻崇琚等前輩學者是怎麼說的，時人又是怎麼說的，這樣立論才有基礎。<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 04:44

“要討論“貢高”這詞兒，應當先看看《慧琳音義》，再看看徐復、蔣禮鴻、閻崇琚等前輩學者是怎麼說的，時人又是怎麼說的，這樣立論才有基礎。”
 
先生说得没错！你指的是“討論“貢高”這詞兒”。我在18楼说的是“贡高”中的“贡”字如果是个假字，那“<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[]<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">”字这个俗体字写作<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 18pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: 华文行楷; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">贡<SPAN lang=ZH-TW style="FONT-SIZE: 18pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 华文行楷; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; mso-fareast-language: ZH-TW; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">瞿<SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">]，就一定是有原因的了。

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 05:01

萧先生的意见：
按：蒋礼鸿《敦煌变文字义通释》引徐复曰：“贡高，佛学术语，就是骄傲自高。贡亦作愩，《集韵》：‘愩，心动也。一曰：自高。’”又引《慧琳音义》卷25：“憍慢贡高，今依《玉篇》，自恣为憍，淩他曰慢，慢前为贡，心举曰高也。”蒋谓“慢前为贡”不甚可解；又引《慧琳音义》卷22：“贡高，《广雅》曰：‘贡，上也。’谓受贡上之国自恃尊高，则轻易附庸之国，今有自高陵物，欲人宾服者，则亦谓之贡高。”蒋谓“这个解释未知确否，附录存参”。阎崇琚曰：“贡高，妄自尊大，高心。”今按徐、阎说是，《慧琳音义》卷9：“虏扈，自大也，谓纵横行也。《汉书音义》曰：‘扈，跋扈也，谓自纵恣也。’经文作‘怙恃’也，‘怙’非此义，经中言‘憍慢’，或作‘贡高’，是也。”可知“贡高”与“憍慢”、“跋扈”义同。<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 05:21

徐复先生说的”贡亦作愩“,可为一说!如果"贡"所假的本字果真是"愩","愩"既训"自高",那“贡高”中的“高”就多余了！除非这个“高”字用作副词，表程度，那"贡高"就是“自高得很”了！
［此主题已被徐伯鸿在 2012-9-17 22:48:17 编辑过］［此主题已被徐伯鸿在 2012-9-18 11:46:24 编辑过］

徐伯鸿 发表于 2012-9-18 06:33

我说了那么多，又陷入了“说文解字”的圈套！我表述过个人的一点想法“对付这些玩意，就不能用研究古文字的套路了。” 也许[贡瞿]中的“瞿”只是标识着[贡瞿]这个字是佛法中讲到的“贡”，用于区别一般的“贡”字罢了！
（瞿，瞿昙氏的省称。亦指佛教或与佛教有关的事物。）［此主题已被徐伯鸿在 2012-9-18 11:50:01 编辑过］

页: 1 [2] 3 4

出土文献与古文字研究学术论坛's Archiver