曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 09:17

讀清華簡《筮法》小劄

<p>
<p style="font-size: 12px; font-weight: normal; "><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold; ">讀清華簡《筮法》小劄</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px; font-weight: normal; "><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 清華簡《筮法》中所反映的占筮原理和易學思想,雖較之後世稍顯原始,但還是可以看到在</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">某些方面含有</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">後來易學思想的影子。</span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px; font-weight: normal; "><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold; ">&nbsp; 比如</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">《筮法》已用“互體”法。在</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">《筮法》</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">第十二節“男女”中,有“凡男,上去二,下去一,中男乃男,女乃女”之語,明顯就是後來易學家常用的“互體”法。</span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px; font-weight: normal; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; "><br>
</span></p>
</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; "><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><br>
</p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 09:28

本帖最后由 曰古氏 于 2014-1-10 09:36 编辑 <br /><br /><p>
</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">懷疑《筮法》已</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">用“先天八卦之數”</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; ">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;">《筮法》圖式基本合於“後天八卦方位”,整理者已經指出。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;">&nbsp; &nbsp; 我們懷疑,經卦所代表的數字是用“先天八卦之數”。這樣,整個《筮法》系統基本同於後來易學家所用的易圖系統(“先天八卦方位”、“後天八卦方位”又稱“伏羲八卦方位”、“文王八卦方位”,具體可參朱熹《周易本義》卷首所附)。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;">&nbsp; &nbsp;例如:在第二節“得”中,有“其失十三”之語,此數字“十三”或許是由四個經卦所代表的先天數相加而得(1+2+8</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">+2</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">),其中本卦內外卦所代表的數字相加得“3”,之卦內外卦</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">所代表的數字相加得“10”,本卦當是有“失”</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">(數字3</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">)</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">,而之卦占筮結果“得”</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">(</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">數字10</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">)</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">,故云</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">“其失十三”。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<div><br>
</div>
<p></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 11:08

<p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">否則,按照原整理者的解釋,“陰占三分之一”,所以說“其失十三”,——這明顯不合數學原理。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">由《算表》所反映的當時所達到的數學高度來看,當時的古人恐怕不會連10以內的除法都算不清楚的。</span></p>
</p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 11:28

本帖最后由 曰古氏 于 2014-1-10 11:30 编辑 <br /><br /><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">第二節“享”</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">凡享,月朝純牝,乃享。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">月夕純牡,乃亦享。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">整理者對於卦象的解釋,全據左下之卦出發(這自然有理),然牽合爻位爲解,似有偏差之處。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">其實,兩個卦例所顯示的卦象極爲明顯:</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">前一卦例,僅左下巽卦有二陽爻,對於“月”來說,陽爻爲明,陰爻爲晦,此月自然是上弦月,故云“月朝”;後一卦例,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">僅左下艮卦有二陰爻,對於“月”來說,自然是下弦月,故云“月夕”;</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">至于“</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">純牝</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">”、</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">“</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">純牡</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">”,更爲明顯。——整理者已經指出,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">前一卦例有三坤卦,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">後一卦例有三乾卦,爲純牝、純牡之象。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 其實,精確些的表述應該是,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">前一卦例有三坤卦和一</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">巽卦,巽爲長女,故爲“純牝”;</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">後一卦例有三乾卦和一艮卦,艮爲少男,故爲“純牡”。</span></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 11:58

本帖最后由 曰古氏 于 2014-1-10 12:27 编辑 <br /><br /><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 18px; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="word-wrap: break-word; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">懷疑《筮法》所</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="word-wrap: break-word; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">用卦象合於《說卦》</span></span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 18px; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="word-wrap: break-word; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; "><br>
</span></span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 18px; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="word-wrap: break-word; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 如第四節“[卞又](弁?)”:凡</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">[卞又](弁?),數而出,乃遂;</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 18px; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="word-wrap: break-word; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">凡</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">[卞又](弁?),數而內(入),乃復(覆)。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 【按:“遂”、“復”相對,又見于第十三節“行”。整理者就字爲訓釋“復”爲“返歸”,似不如讀</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">“復”</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">爲“覆”,訓爲“敗”,與“遂(成事)”意義恰好相反。】</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 前一卦例,兌卦居外,爲他人,據《說卦》“兌爲毀折”,於我則爲成事,故云“遂”;</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 後一卦例,恰好相反,兌卦居內,於我爲毀折,故云“復(覆)”。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); "><br>
</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 同理,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">第十三節“行”,本卦中兌居外,於</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">他人“</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">爲毀折”,於我則爲成事,故云“遂”;之卦艮居內</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">據《說卦》“</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">艮,止也</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">”,於我爲事止不通,故云</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">“復(覆)”。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 12:43

本帖最后由 曰古氏 于 2014-1-10 12:45 编辑 <br /><br /><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">懷疑《筮法》已經包含“五行</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">相</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">剋</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">”思維</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">第十六節,有“內勝外”,內離外坎(對應《周易》水火既濟卦);“外勝內”,內坎外離(對應《周易》火水未濟卦);</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">在</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">《筮法》所代表的五行系統中,坎爲火,離爲水(參第二十一節),水剋火,故有</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">“內勝外”和</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">“外勝內”之說。</span></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 13:01

<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">第十七節“成”中,所謂的“同”,整理者以爲是中心四爻的“同”與否。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">卦象似乎沒有這麽看的。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">我們懷疑</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">“同”</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Simsun; font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; background-color: rgb(252, 248, 241); ">是指本卦和之卦所含爻畫的相同。前一卦例,左右兩卦有四爻相同,佔三分之二,故云“同”;後一卦例,左右兩卦僅有兩爻相同,僅佔三分之一,故云“不同”。</span></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-10 13:13

<p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">最後一段幾句話,整理者已經指出,之、扐、忒三字押之、職部韻。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">其實,前一句“是”、“卦”也押支部韻。</span></p>
</p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-11 10:33

<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">納甲筮法並非創自京房</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 傳統易學都以爲納甲筮法由西漢京房所創造。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 今由清華簡《筮法》第二十五節“天干與卦”,結合《別卦》所見六十四卦分列“八宮”圖表,可知</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">納甲筮法並非京房自創,而是淵源有自,是繼承先秦固有的一種筮法而形成的。</span></p>

曰古氏 发表于 2014-1-11 11:03

<p><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;">&nbsp; &nbsp; 可以想見,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">在先秦時期,民間當有傳習《筮法》這類占筮方法者。</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">秦火不焚卜筮之書,故此類筮法在民間流傳不絕。</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">到西漢時,京房學得此法,稍加改造整理,最終形成流傳至今的“納甲筮法”。</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">&nbsp; &nbsp; 而究其實,納甲筮法的核心思想(即將十干納入八卦)並非京房獨創,而是源自先秦以</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 19px; font-weight: bold; ">《筮法》爲代表的這類占筮方法。</span></p>
页: [1] 2 3 4 5
查看完整版本: 讀清華簡《筮法》小劄