《“法”字古文音釋》的一點補充
<P><FONT size=4>我在拙文《“法”字古文音釋》一文中說：</FONT></P><P><FONT size=4>“‘法’字古文‘灋（法）’字所从的聲符‘去’就是談魚相通的活化石。”</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=4>近檢羅常培、周祖謨先生《漢魏晉南北朝韻部演變研究》，知漢人以“法”字韻鐸部字，可為古文“法”字从白聲提供旁證。</FONT></P>
<P></P><FONT size=4>焦延壽《焦氏易林》（羅周從胡適說，以為崔篆所作）：</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4>《乾之萃》：“任劣力薄，孱駑恐怯；如蝟見鵲，不敢距格。”密韻，句句入韻。“薄怯鵲格”。</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4>《復之坎》：“桎梏拘獲，身入牢獄。髠刑受法，終不得釋。”密韻，句句入韻。“獲獄法釋”韻。</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4>《比之豐》：“李耳彙鵲，更相恐怯。偃爾以腹，不能距格。” “鵲怯格”韻。</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4> </FONT><FONT size=4>班固《漢書序傳》：“虙羲畫卦，書契後作。虞夏商周，孔纂其業。篹書刪詩，綴禮正樂。彖系大易，因史立法。”“作業樂法”韻。</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4>又：“世宗曄曄，思弘祖業；疇咨熙載，髦俊並作。”“曄業作”韻（董珊有文曾論及曄字當從華聲，此可為其旁證）。</FONT>
<P></P><FONT size=4>又：“髙陽文法，揚鄉武略。政事之材，道德惟薄。位過厥任，鮮終其祿。博之翰音，鼔妖先作。”“法略薄祿作”韻。</FONT><FONT size=4> </FONT><p>［此主题已被 一上示三王 在 2011-12-8 11:40:29 编辑过］
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; TEXT-INDENT: 21pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt" class=MsoNormal align=left><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><FONT size=5>《詩經·大雅·常武》：“赫赫業業，有嚴天子，王舒保作。”</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; TEXT-INDENT: 21pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt" class=MsoNormal align=left><FONT size=5><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">王力先生以為盍鐸合韻（王力《詩經韻讀》<SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 125%; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-no-proof: yes; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">第</SPAN><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 125%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-no-proof: yes; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" lang=EN-US>37</SPAN><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 125%; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-no-proof: yes; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">頁、第<SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 125%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-no-proof: yes; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" lang=EN-US>415</SPAN><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 125%; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-no-proof: yes; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">頁</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">，</SPAN><SPAN lang=EN-US>1986</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">，《王力文集》第六卷，山東教育出版社）</SPAN><SPAN lang=EN-US><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
補一個例子：4315秦公簋「保 厥秦，虩使蠻夏」，楊樹達說：「 字從古文業，去蓋加聲旁字。去古音在模部，得為古文業之聲旁者，去聲之字如 刧皆讀入帖部，業與 刧音近，去得為 刧之聲旁，亦得為業之聲旁矣。」（《積微居金文說》26頁）,
看来对转、旁转之类术语绝不像某些人说的那样没有科学依据。韵腹相同或近似，就有通押的可能。
謝海天兄補充資料！拙作《談魚通轉說簡史》正在收集資料，這個很有用喲！
<P><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">蓬生先生，別客氣！下午字形傳不上去，現重新貼一次：</FONT></P>
<P><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">4315秦公簋「保<IMG width=44 height=37 src="/ewebeditor/uploadfile/luntan/2012/04/06/20120406220242422001.png">厥秦，虩使蠻夏」，楊樹達說：「<IMG width=13 height=18 src="/ewebeditor/uploadfile/luntan/2012/04/06/20120406220242475002.png">字從古文業，去蓋加聲旁字。去古音在模部，得為古文業之聲旁者，去聲之字如<IMG width=15 height=16 src="/ewebeditor/uploadfile/luntan/2012/04/06/20120406220243427003.jpg">刧皆讀入帖部，業與<IMG width=15 height=16 src="/ewebeditor/uploadfile/luntan/2012/04/06/20120406220243427003.jpg">刧音近，去得為<IMG width=15 height=16 src="/ewebeditor/uploadfile/luntan/2012/04/06/20120406220243427003.jpg">刧之聲旁，亦得為業之聲旁矣。」（《積微居金文說》26頁）</FONT></P>,
<P style="MARGIN: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">山井鼎、物觀《七經孟子考文補遺》（《四庫全書》本）：</P>
<P style="MARGIN: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“孟子曰伯夷”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">至</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“此之謂也”。</SPAN></P>
<P style="MARGIN: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">［考異］：</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">古本</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">《註》“仁人呼復歸之矣”，“呼”作“將”。”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">○</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">《章指》</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">言</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">：“王政普大，教其常業。各養其老，使不餒之。二老聞之，歸身自記。衆鳥不羅，翔鳯來集。亦斯類也。</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">謹按：</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“餒之”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">，足利本作</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“凍餒”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">，</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">《疏》</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">作</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“餒乏”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">。</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“自記”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">，足利本作</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“自託”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">，</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">《疏》</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">作</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun">“自己”</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">。</SPAN></P>
<P style="MARGIN: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"> </P>
<P style="MARGIN: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">我們似可據此諸本差異恢復《章指》原貌：“王政普大，教其常業。各養其老，使不餒乏（“之”為“乏”之壞字）。二老聞之，歸身自託（一誤為“記”，二誤為“己”）。衆鳥不羅，翔鳯來集。亦斯類也。”業、乏（盍部）、託（鐸部）、集（緝部）韻。</P>
精彩，高邮王氏亦时常以韵文韵脚进行校勘
<P>謝張先生鼓勵！古人云：“日思誤書，自是一適。”不過，我覺得這東西有點像毒品，一旦上癮，將無法自拔。自己在這里兜售這些東西，有販毒之嫌，敬請各位見諒！</P>
页:
[1]